Fdis Vs Xly Comparing Consumer Discretionary Etfs Usefidelity

fdis Vs Xly Comparing Consumer Discretionary Etfs Usefidelity
fdis Vs Xly Comparing Consumer Discretionary Etfs Usefidelity

Fdis Vs Xly Comparing Consumer Discretionary Etfs Usefidelity Fdis has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while xly has an expense ratio of 0.12%. this means that for every $10,000 invested, fdis will charge $8 in fees, while xly will charge $12. xly is significantly larger than fdis, with total net assets of 20.75 billion compared to fdis’ 1.57 billion. you will find that it’s easier to enter and exit trades. Fdis vs. xly performance comparison. in the year to date period, fdis achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly higher than xly's 2.86% return. over the past 10 years, fdis has outperformed xly with an annualized return of 12.67%, while xly has yielded a comparatively lower 11.70% annualized return.

Whats The Best consumer discretionary etf fdis Vcr xly Rcd
Whats The Best consumer discretionary etf fdis Vcr xly Rcd

Whats The Best Consumer Discretionary Etf Fdis Vcr Xly Rcd Check out the side by side comparison table of fdis vs. xly. it compares fees, performance, dividend yield, holdings, technical indicators, and many other metrics that help make better etf investing decisions. Xly and fdis are both exchange traded funds (etfs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. xly is a passively managed fund by state street that tracks the performance of the consumer discretionary select sector index. it was launched on dec 16, 1998. fdis is a passively managed fund by fidelity. Fdis vs vcr: expense ratio. the expense ratio of fdis is 0.08%, while the expense ratio of vcr is 0.10%. fidelity consumer discretionary etf has a relatively low expense ratio, and is lower than the average expense ratio of similar funds. this makes fdis a cost effective way to invest in the consumer discretionary sector. Compare etfs fdis and xly on performance, aum, flows, holdings, costs and esg ratings.

Comments are closed.